| 宋清坤,王一帆,李林记,徐连利,杜小冲,毕广旭,宋晓焱.历史遗留废弃矿山生态环境保护与修复工程成效评估[J].矿产勘查,2025,16(S1):274-282 |
| 历史遗留废弃矿山生态环境保护与修复工程成效评估 |
| Effectiveness evaluation on the ecological environmental protection and restora-tion for the historical abandoned mines |
| 投稿时间：2025-01-14 |
| DOI：10.20008/j.kckc.2025S1034 |
| 中文关键词: 鹤壁地区 矿山生态保护与修复 层次分析法 成效评估指标体系 |
| 英文关键词: Hebi Region mine ecological protection and restoration analytic hierarchy process(AHP) effectiveness evaluation indicator system |
| 基金项目:本文受河南省科技攻关项目(232102320265，232102320126)和河南省自然资源部省合作科技项目(豫部省合作2024-2)联合资助。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 687 |
| 全文下载次数: 174 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为确保生态环境保护与修复工程措施的有效性和可持续性，有必要开展工程成效评估工作，为决策指导、资源优化利用、工程措施调整等提供科学依据。本文从工程成效出发，以鹤壁市历史遗留矿山生态环境保护与修复工程为研究对象，从生态、经济、社会效益 3个层面，构建含有 8个指标的评估体系，采用层次分析法对各指标权重进行计算，权重由高到低依次为:水源涵养( 0. 212)、水土保持( 0. 198)、植被提升(0. 119)、土地利用( 0. 112)、土壤质量改善( 0. 105)、人居环境改善( 0. 103)、防灾减灾能力( 0. 098)生态衍生产业产值增长( 0. 053)。对不同生态保护与修复工程成效综合指数( EPRI)进行计算，结果表明:优秀(EPRI>90)的生态环境保护与修复工程占比 3. 7%、良好( 70 |
| 英文摘要: |
| To ensure the effectiveness and sustainability of ecological environmental protection and restoration engineering measures，it is essential to conduct assessments of the outcomes of these protection and restorationprojects. This provides a scientific basis for decision-making guidance，optimized resource utilization，and adjust. ments to engineering measures. This paper focuses on the outcomes of ecological environmental protection andrestoration projects in historically abandoned mines，using the historical mines in Hebi City as a case study. From the perspectives of ecological，economic，and social benefits，an evaluation system comprising eight assessment indicators was constructed. The Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)was employed to calculate the weights of each indicator，which are ranked from highest to lowest as follows:water conservation(0. 212)，soil and water conserva. tion(0. 198)，vegetation enhancement(0. 119)，land use(0. 112)，soil quality improvement(0. 105)，improve. ment of living environment(0. 103)，disaster prevention and mitigation capacity(0. 098)，and growth in ecologi. cal derivative industry output(0. 053). The comprehensive index of ecological protection and restoration effective. ness(EPRI)was calculated for different projects. The results indicate that 3. 7% of the ecological environmentalprotection and restoration projects were rated as excellent(EPRI > 90)， 33. 33% as good(70 |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |